Friday, September 18, 2015
The GOP Debate According To Paul Krugman
Paul Krugman has the virtue of writing an opinion column for the NYT; consequently, he does not have to conform to the journalistic custom of reporting on the debate as if it were a sporting event in which some scored more points than others. David Brooks has a similar position at the NYT. He declared that the winners were Marco Rubio and Carly Fiorina. His op-ed explains why they would be great for the country. After reading the Krugman op-ed you may appreciate the skill the David Brooks exercises in maintaining the fictions about their ability to run our nation. Brooks knows how to put lipstick on a pig. According to Brooks, Rubio and Fiorina were the only candidates that did not fall flat on their faces. Brooks has a tougher job than Krugman. He had to find something good in the debate. Its hard to believe that this is the best that we can do in selecting our leaders.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment